← Back to the photo package add-on pricing calculator

Is a second shooter worth it?

An add-on reads as one number — "$300 for an extra hour" or "$450 for a second shooter" — and that number is the one thing it does not tell you: how much the add-on actually pays once you count what it takes to deliver it. Two real-shaped add-ons below, run through the same arithmetic, end up in very different places.

The solid add-on: an extra hour of coverage

Target hourly rate $75. One extra shoot hour, plus half an hour of culling and an hour and a half of editing the extra images it generates — three hours of the photographer's own time. A $5 gear wear allowance, no subcontractor and no physical goods, charged at $300.

Amount
Gross revenue$300.00
Your labor cost (at target rate)$225.00
Total cost$230.00
Net profit$70.00
Effective hourly rate$23.33/hr
Profit margin23.3%

This add-on pays the photographer's full target rate for all three hours, plus another $23.33/hr on top — a genuinely profitable add-on, not just one that "sounds fine."

The underpriced add-on: a second shooter at $450

Same target hourly rate. No extra shoot hours for the primary photographer, but the second shooter's take adds an hour and a half of culling and two hours of editing — three and a half hours of the primary photographer's own time. A $250 fee paid to the second shooter and a $10 gear wear allowance for the extra body, charged at $450 — a number that sounds like it should easily cover a $250 payout.

Amount
Gross revenue$450.00
Your labor cost (at target rate)$262.50
Total cost$522.50
Net profit-$72.50
Effective hourly rate-$20.71/hr
Profit margin-16.1%

-$72.50 and a -16.1% margin are a loss, not a rounding error: this add-on's own cost — the second shooter's fee, the gear wear, and 3.5 hours of the primary photographer's own culling and editing valued at their own target rate — adds up to more than the $450 charged. A photographer who only checks "does $450 cover the $250 I'm paying the second shooter" keeps taking these.

The difference is culling, editing, and the subcontractor fee — not the headline price

$150 separated these two add-on prices, and $44.05/hr separated what they actually paid. The second shooter's own fee is easy to check against the price charged; the primary photographer's own extra culling and editing hours are not, because nothing invoices for them. Run your own numbers before you set a second-shooter price from what other studios charge rather than from what the add-on actually costs you.

Common questions

Why does the second-shooter add-on show a loss if clients are happy to pay $450 for it?

Because none of its costs disappeared -- the extra culling and editing hours, the subcontractor fee, and the gear wear apply no matter what the client is happy to pay. Together they cost more than the $450 charged, which the headline price alone never shows.

What is the fastest way to tell two add-ons apart?

Compare effective hourly rate, not the headline price. The extra-hour add-on pays about $23.33/hr above target on this booking; the second-shooter add-on pays about -$20.71/hr for a costlier version of the same booking -- a $150 gap in price hides a $44.05/hr gap in what the add-on actually paid.