← Soffit and Fascia Bid Calculator
This calculator vs. a flat rate per lineal foot
“$12 a foot” is not a price for an eave — it is a price for one specific scope, story count, and condition, quietly charged again for a different job that only looks the same length from the ladder.
What a flat rate per lineal foot is
It is the fastest way to quote soffit and fascia: multiply the eave footage — the number anyone can walk off with a wheel — by a published rate. Homeowners shop it because it is easy to compare between bids, and it is the number a customer holding a postcard special or a cheaper competitor's quote will ask you to match.
It is wrong because the eave footage says nothing about the scope. A rate set for wrapping aluminum over existing trim on a 1-story ranch gets reused for a full tear-off wood replace on a two-story house with rot and a gutter detach, because both jobs happen to run about the same number of feet.
What this calculator is
This page keeps no account and sends nothing to a server. You enter the eave footage, wrap versus vinyl-replace versus wood-replace scope, story access, soffit type, rot, extra corners, porch beams, and gutter and pest extras, plus your crew's rates. It turns that into the walk-away price, the price per lineal foot, and a same-eave three-scope comparison so you can see when a wood-replace job flips a wrap-priced special.
| What a flat lineal-foot rate does | What this calculator does instead |
|---|---|
| Prices the job by eave footage alone, whichever scope, story count, or condition is actually involved. | Prices wrap, vinyl-replace, and wood-replace as three different labor and material builds, each from its own hours and cost per foot. |
| Uses the same $/LF whether it is a ladder job or a two-story pump-jack or three-story scaffold job. | Adds access hours, an access-time premium per foot, and a scaffold or pump-jack invoice by story count. |
| Has no line for rot, so a clean wrap and a job with 48 feet of rotten fascia are quoted the same. | Prices rot repair, extra corners, and porch beams as their own lines, each visible instead of buried in a bigger, wrong number. |
| Folds a gutter detach and reset, or bird and wasp cleanup, into the same flat rate, or leaves them out. | Prices gutter detach/reset and pest cleanup as optional extras only when the job actually needs them. |
| Gives the crew a rate to quote, not a number to check a quote against. | Reports the price, the price per lineal foot, and the walk-away price, so a shopped rate can be tested against the real job before it goes out. |
One rate, two very different eaves
Using this calculator's own job presets. A 160-LF ranch, aluminum wrap-over-existing, vented soffit, 1-story, no rot — the cheap special — prices at $3,315.58, which works out to $20.72 per lineal foot.
A two-story wood-replace job — new wood fascia and soffit, then wrapped, vented, with 48 LF of rot repair, two porch beams, eight extra corners, and a gutter detach and reset — is 200 lineal feet of eave, not far off the ranch job's 160. But it is a different job in every other dimension: a full replace instead of a wrap, pump jacks instead of a ladder, and rot, beam, corner, and gutter lines the special has none of. Matching the ranch job's $20.72-a-foot rate to this job's 200 feet gives a quote of $4,144.47.
This calculator prices the same two-story wood-replace job at $13,057.93 — a real rate of $65.29 per lineal foot, 3.2 times the ranch job's rate. The flat lineal-foot quote covers about 31.7% of the real cost, a shortfall of $8,913.46. Nothing about the two jobs' eave-footage numbers — 160 versus 200, a modest difference — warns that one job is more than three times the per-foot cost of the other once the scope, access, and extras are priced.
Nobody is being careless by reaching for a $-per-foot rate first — it is the number that is easiest to compare between bids. The gap is everything a lineal-foot number cannot see: the wrap-versus-replace scope, the story access, the rot, and the extras, which is exactly what this calculator prices and a rate copied from the last job cannot.
Common questions
Why does a flat rate per lineal foot of eave get soffit and fascia wrong?
Because the eave footage tells you the length of the job but nothing about the scope. A $12-or-so "wrap and fascia special" is priced for a 1-story ranch, wrap-over-existing, vented soffit, extension ladder, no rot -- the cheapest version of the job in every dimension. The same rate applied to a two-story wood-replace with rot repair and a gutter reset is missing the access equipment, the labor to tear off and rebuild instead of wrap, the lumber, and the rot and gutter lines entirely.
How big is the gap in practice?
Using this calculator's own job presets: a 160-LF ranch wrap-over-existing, vented, no rot, prices at $3,315.58, which works out to $20.72 per lineal foot. Applying that same $20.72 rate to a 200-LF two-story wood-replace job with 48 LF of rot repair, extra corners, and a gutter detach and reset gives a quote of $4,144.47. This calculator prices that job at $13,057.93: the flat per-foot rate covers about 31.7% of the real cost, an $8,913.46 shortfall.
What does pricing by a flat lineal-foot rate leave out entirely?
Everything the eave count alone cannot see: whether it is a wrap over existing trim or a full tear-off and replace, the extra labor and equipment for two-story pump jacks or three-story scaffolding versus a ladder, the material cost of a wood replace over an aluminum wrap, rot repair, extra corners, and a gutter detach and reset. A lineal-foot rate has no line for any of them, so a job that looks like a similar length to the special it was copied from is priced the same as one that is several times the scope.
Is pricing by a flat lineal-foot rate ever close enough?
For a narrow band of near-identical jobs -- same wrap-versus-replace scope, same story count, similar soffit type, little or no rot -- a flat rate set for one job can land close on the next. The risk is applying a rate learned on a 1-story wrap special to a job that looks like a similar eave length but carries a taller access requirement, a full replace instead of a wrap, or rot, corner, and gutter extras, because the lineal-foot number alone cannot tell you when that has happened.
Does this calculator know what to charge in my market?
No. It has no data on local rates, material costs, or what competitors charge. It takes your eave footage, wrap-versus-replace scope, stories, soffit type, rot, and extras, and your own crew rates, and turns them into a price built from the actual job -- the arithmetic a flat per-foot special skips, not a market survey.
Nothing here says or implies that quoting a flat rate per lineal foot is a bad-faith practice — it is a common, honest shortcut that works until the next job stops matching the one the rate was set on.
Open the Soffit and Fascia Bid Calculator to price your own job, or read how much to charge for soffit and fascia.